<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for BarBelle</title>
	<atom:link href="http://barbelle.leoweekly.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://barbelle.leoweekly.com</link>
	<description>Gettin' Drunky in Kentucky</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 22:30:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Today&#8217;s Reason To Drink by The Bar Belle</title>
		<link>http://barbelle.leoweekly.com/2009/01/06/todays-reason-to-drink-466/#comment-1051</link>
		<dc:creator>The Bar Belle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 19:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barbelle.leoweekly.com/?p=2711#comment-1051</guid>
		<description>Well, unfortunately I've managed to find some drama in my early 30s. But that doesn't stop me from drinking!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, unfortunately I&#8217;ve managed to find some drama in my early 30s. But that doesn&#8217;t stop me from drinking!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Today&#8217;s Reason To Drink by Roger A. Baylor</title>
		<link>http://barbelle.leoweekly.com/2009/01/06/todays-reason-to-drink-466/#comment-1050</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger A. Baylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 17:29:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barbelle.leoweekly.com/?p=2711#comment-1050</guid>
		<description>My 20's, 30's, and so far, my 40's.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My 20&#8217;s, 30&#8217;s, and so far, my 40&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Today&#8217;s Reason To Drink by chad knopf</title>
		<link>http://barbelle.leoweekly.com/2009/01/01/todays-reason-to-drink-464/#comment-1047</link>
		<dc:creator>chad knopf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 16:25:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barbelle.leoweekly.com/?p=2705#comment-1047</guid>
		<description>Hey Sara, just looked over your movie list for the year and I'm pretty much in agreeance, Milk might even edge out Wall-E or The Dark Knight as my best film of the year (I never thought I'd see a movie where I didn't hate Sean Penn...the only time I cam close before was Fast Times and Mystic River, and the latter just because Eastwood is a hell of a director)...but I disagree on your take on Sex and The City. While I was only the most baseline casual fan of the series (code for: I didn't always turn it off and know the jist of the series' events) I didn't take the movie as a strike against women's lib. "One step forward for rich bitches, two steps back for women’s lib. Man cheats on woman. Woman leaves man and finds solid ground. Woman’s dumbass friend talks her into taking man back." I get that take but you forgot the part Where after Woman leaves man but before woman finds solid ground, she deliberately projects her own misery on dumbass friend's fiancee and stokes his self doubt, ruining dumbass friend's dream wedding and waiting til the last ten minutes of the way too damn long movie to step up, act like an adult, and take the consequence for that. You also forgot the part where woman's decadent sex-loving friend who is stuck in boring relationship finally takes the reigns and realizes that she loves herself more and chooses her own adventure forward. That smells suspiciously like women's lib to me. I guess in the end, you take the good, you take the bad, you take them both and there you have...just a movie that was too long, not a strike against women, nor a big score in the plus column either. Come up to Flanagan's some Thursday when Matt and I are there and we'll hash this out over a beer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Sara, just looked over your movie list for the year and I&#8217;m pretty much in agreeance, Milk might even edge out Wall-E or The Dark Knight as my best film of the year (I never thought I&#8217;d see a movie where I didn&#8217;t hate Sean Penn&#8230;the only time I cam close before was Fast Times and Mystic River, and the latter just because Eastwood is a hell of a director)&#8230;but I disagree on your take on Sex and The City. While I was only the most baseline casual fan of the series (code for: I didn&#8217;t always turn it off and know the jist of the series&#8217; events) I didn&#8217;t take the movie as a strike against women&#8217;s lib. &#8220;One step forward for rich bitches, two steps back for women’s lib. Man cheats on woman. Woman leaves man and finds solid ground. Woman’s dumbass friend talks her into taking man back.&#8221; I get that take but you forgot the part Where after Woman leaves man but before woman finds solid ground, she deliberately projects her own misery on dumbass friend&#8217;s fiancee and stokes his self doubt, ruining dumbass friend&#8217;s dream wedding and waiting til the last ten minutes of the way too damn long movie to step up, act like an adult, and take the consequence for that. You also forgot the part where woman&#8217;s decadent sex-loving friend who is stuck in boring relationship finally takes the reigns and realizes that she loves herself more and chooses her own adventure forward. That smells suspiciously like women&#8217;s lib to me. I guess in the end, you take the good, you take the bad, you take them both and there you have&#8230;just a movie that was too long, not a strike against women, nor a big score in the plus column either. Come up to Flanagan&#8217;s some Thursday when Matt and I are there and we&#8217;ll hash this out over a beer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Today&#8217;s Reason To Drink by doug</title>
		<link>http://barbelle.leoweekly.com/2009/01/01/todays-reason-to-drink-464/#comment-1046</link>
		<dc:creator>doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 00:53:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barbelle.leoweekly.com/?p=2705#comment-1046</guid>
		<description>hair of the dog. line up some shots!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hair of the dog. line up some shots!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Today&#8217;s Reason To Drink by Woodfordman</title>
		<link>http://barbelle.leoweekly.com/2008/12/30/todays-reason-to-drink-462/#comment-1045</link>
		<dc:creator>Woodfordman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 15:06:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barbelle.leoweekly.com/?p=2692#comment-1045</guid>
		<description>it's a beautiful life...if ace of base came to the ville.  NOT...can't believe I know an ace of base song.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#8217;s a beautiful life&#8230;if ace of base came to the ville.  NOT&#8230;can&#8217;t believe I know an ace of base song.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Today&#8217;s Reason To Drink by Woodfordman</title>
		<link>http://barbelle.leoweekly.com/2008/12/29/todays-reason-to-drink-461/#comment-1044</link>
		<dc:creator>Woodfordman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 15:37:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barbelle.leoweekly.com/?p=2690#comment-1044</guid>
		<description>so what are you going to sing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so what are you going to sing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Today&#8217;s Reason To Drink by Woodfordman</title>
		<link>http://barbelle.leoweekly.com/2008/12/26/todays-reason-to-drink-460/#comment-1043</link>
		<dc:creator>Woodfordman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 15:37:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barbelle.leoweekly.com/?p=2688#comment-1043</guid>
		<description>amen.  i'll drink to that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>amen.  i&#8217;ll drink to that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Today&#8217;s Reason To Drink by Woodfordman</title>
		<link>http://barbelle.leoweekly.com/2008/12/24/todays-reason-to-drink-459/#comment-1042</link>
		<dc:creator>Woodfordman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 15:36:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barbelle.leoweekly.com/?p=2686#comment-1042</guid>
		<description>wow...so how's that work?  hopefully you didn't fall.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow&#8230;so how&#8217;s that work?  hopefully you didn&#8217;t fall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Today&#8217;s Reason To Drink by The Bar Belle</title>
		<link>http://barbelle.leoweekly.com/2008/12/23/todays-reason-to-drink-458/#comment-1041</link>
		<dc:creator>The Bar Belle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 21:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barbelle.leoweekly.com/?p=2684#comment-1041</guid>
		<description>You mean across the bridge?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You mean across the bridge?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Spike the Nog! by Woodfordman</title>
		<link>http://barbelle.leoweekly.com/2008/12/22/spike-the-nog/#comment-1040</link>
		<dc:creator>Woodfordman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 16:51:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barbelle.leoweekly.com/?p=2681#comment-1040</guid>
		<description>why not?  we already add alcohol to coffee, candy, yams, barbecue sauce...i mean, this calls for a bar belle spirits cookbook.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why not?  we already add alcohol to coffee, candy, yams, barbecue sauce&#8230;i mean, this calls for a bar belle spirits cookbook.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
